Preliminary Doppler Ultrasound Vascular Mapping: As A Guide to Vascular Access Placement for Hemodialysis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (Pilot Study) |
Joseph Michael P. Abcede, M.D. |
Abigail Teodora Tosoc-Abonal, M.D.1, Edberto R. General. M.D.2, Michael John C. San Gabriel, M.D.3, Libertad N. Rosales, M.D.3, Eduardo Vicente S. Caguioa, M.D.3, H. Penafiel, M.D.3, L. Lapena, M.D.4, Jesus Sanchez, M.D.4 |
Submission/Publication Date |
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the patency of vascular
access created for hemodialysis with and without the
use of pre-operative Doppler ultrasound (US) vascular
mapping.
Setting: University of Santo Tomas Hospital,
España, Manila.
Materials and Methods: All adult patients with
chronic kidney disease, either admitted or seen in the
out-patient clinic and hemodialysis center from the
months of February to September 2004, who will undergo
permanent vascular access placement for hemodialysis
for the first time, were randomized into two arms: with
and without vascular mapping. Patients with previous
arteriovenous fistula, graft and vascular surgery in the
upper extremities were excluded from the study. The
clinical profile of patients, the preferred type and location
of vascular access of the surgeon before and after
vascular mapping results were noted. The patency and
complications of the vascular access with pre-operative
vascular mapping were compared with those without
vascular mapping.
Results: Among 42 patients, 18 (43%) had preoperative
vascular mapping and 24 (57%) underwent
vascular access placement without vascular mapping.
The clinical profile (age, sex and etiology of chronic
kidney disease) was not statistically different between
the two groups (p-value>0.5) using the Mann-Whitney U
test for the age variable and Chi-square test for the
remaining variables. Likewise, there was no significant
difference in terms of the surgeon’s preference for the
type and location of the vascular access between the
two groups (p-value>0.05) using the Chi-square test. The
vascular access of all patients who had pre-operative
vascular mapping remained patent all throughout the
study period. Among those without pre-operative
vascular mapping, 4 (17%) had patency failure. The
computed adjusted risk ratio or relative risk is 0.6,
hence, vascular mapping is effective in ensuring the
functional patency of vascular access for at least 8
weeks from the time of cannulation.
Conclusion: There seems to be a beneficial effect
in terms of patency of vascular access created for
hemodialysis with the use of preoperative Doppler
ultrasound vascular mapping based on the relative risk
(RR 0.68). |

|